歐盟刑事跨境電子取證制度的新發(fā)展及啟示
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
孫鍵
西南交通大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院
摘要： 在數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代，刑事犯罪與網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的深入融合凸顯了電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)在刑案?jìng)善浦械闹匾匚弧？缇成婢W(wǎng)刑案的日益增多也讓各國(guó)日益關(guān)注跨境電子取證制度的建設(shè)。在復(fù)雜的案件環(huán)境中，我國(guó)目前大力推行的刑事司法協(xié)助制度有著適用范圍小、啟動(dòng)后效率低的問(wèn)題。作為補(bǔ)充的單邊跨境電子取證制度則僅以缺乏有效監(jiān)督體系、范圍同樣有限的網(wǎng)絡(luò)在線提取為主。二者均難以滿足跨境電子取證高效率、取證充分的需求。以歐盟《電子證據(jù)條例》（European Production and Preservation Orders Regulation）為參考，可以看到屬人主義單邊跨境電子取證制度成為國(guó)際主流。有鑒于歐盟單邊跨境電子取證制度中對(duì)傳統(tǒng)主權(quán)理論的突破，我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)率先構(gòu)建以網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商為取證節(jié)點(diǎn)的屬人主義刑事單邊跨境電子取證制度，再考慮刑事司法協(xié)助的改良方法，這有利于提高效率，充分取證，助力涉網(wǎng)跨境刑事案件的偵破，掌握國(guó)際網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的主動(dòng)性與話語(yǔ)權(quán)，維護(hù)我國(guó)數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)。
中圖分類號(hào)：D924.3文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2025.05.012
引用格式：孫鍵. 歐盟刑事跨境電子取證制度的新發(fā)展及啟示［J］.網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理，2025，44（5）：78-84.
引用格式：孫鍵. 歐盟刑事跨境電子取證制度的新發(fā)展及啟示［J］.網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理，2025，44（5）：78-84.
The new developments and enlightenments of the EU′s cross-border electronic evidence collection system in criminal matters
Sun Jian
School of Public Affairs & Law, Southwest Jiaotong University
Abstract： In the era of data, the deep integration of criminal activities with cyberspace highlights the important role of electronic data evidence in criminal case detection. The increasing number of cross-border cyber crimes also draws increasing attention from countries to the construction of cross-border electronic evidence collection systems. In the complex case environment, the criminal judicial assistance system that is currently being vigorously promoted in our country has problems such as a small scope of application and low efficiency after initiation. The unilateral cross-border electronic evidence collection system, which serves as a supplement, mainly relies on online extraction with a limited scope and lacks an effective supervision system. Neither of them can meet the needs of improving efficiency and obtaining sufficient evidence in cross-border electronic evidence collection. Taking the European Production and Preservation Orders Regulation as a reference, it can be seen that the personalism unilateral cross-border electronic evidence collection system has become the international mainstream. In view of the breakthrough of traditional sovereignty theory in the EU′s unilateral cross-border electronic evidence collection system, China should take the lead in building a personalism-based criminal unilateral cross-border electronic evidence collection system with network service providers as the evidence collection nodes. Then, we should consider the improvement methods of criminal judicial assistance. This will improve efficiency, ensure sufficient evidence collection, assist in the investigation and resolution of cross-border cybercrime cases, and enable us to take the initiative and have a say in the international cyberspace, thereby safeguarding our country′s dat
Key words : cross-border evidence collection; electronic data; data sovereignty; protective jurisdiction; personality
引言
隨著犯罪與網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息技術(shù)的融合不斷深化，絕大多數(shù)犯罪轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橛|網(wǎng)犯罪，電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)亦是打擊涉網(wǎng)犯罪的主要證據(jù)類型［1］。2024年2月7日，最高人民法院發(fā)布跨境電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙及其關(guān)聯(lián)犯罪典型案例8起，其中在被告人謝某浩、陳某旺詐騙、偷越國(guó)（邊）境，被告人林某掩飾、隱瞞犯罪所得案中指出：“近年來(lái)，一些不法分子為逃避國(guó)內(nèi)打擊、牟取非法利益，紛紛將詐騙窩點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移至境外，相當(dāng)一部分人員偷越國(guó)境后盤踞在緬甸北部等地成立犯罪集團(tuán)或組成犯罪團(tuán)伙，對(duì)境內(nèi)居民實(shí)施電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪。”可見(jiàn)，我國(guó)刑事偵查機(jī)關(guān)跨境收集境外儲(chǔ)存網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)的需求正在不斷增加。
本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載：
http://www.xxav2194.com/resource/share/2000006551
作者信息：
孫鍵
（西南交通大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院，四川成都610031）
此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng)，未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。